image


image

New programmatic approach

Revisions to programs and

committee input on program scoring

image


Revisions to program names and project types

image

image

image

STC programs


Investment impact on regional vision and plan focus areas

80%


Investment impact on regional vision and plan focus areas

80%

Today we will take a second look with your expertise – revisions today will be presented to TPC

Investment impact on future scenarios 12%

High = 1/4 of sco re M ed = 1/8 of sco re Lo w = 0

Investment difficulty factor 8%

Final impact score

NIRPC committee responsible


Program category

NIRPC program name


Project type

eligible projects by FHWA/FTA rules


Project type description

Connected

Renewed

United

Vibrant

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

New chances for a

new frontier

Sharp and in focus

Stay in your lane

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Railw ay-highw ay grade crossings

Projects that address safety issues at railroad crossings

0

1/2

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

1/2

0

H

H

H

M

62

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Intersection safety improvements

Projects that attemp to reduce safety issues at intersections

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

M

H

H

L

58

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Intersection congestion improvements

Projects that attempt to reduce congestion at bottleneck locations

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

1/2

0

1

0

1/2

0

M

M

H

L

56

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Bridge rehabilitation or reconstruction

Projects that rehabilitate or reconstruct bridges on FA roads

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

1

0

H

H

H

L

54

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction

Projects that rehabilitate or reconstruct FA roads

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

1

0

H

H

H

L

54

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Intelligent Transportation Systems

Projects that use technology to increase efficiency of transportation system

1/2

0

1

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

1/2

1

1/2

1/2

1

1/2

H

H

M

L

52

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Traffic monitoring / management / control

Funding for the monitoring and management of traffic (usually a state level initiative)

1/2

0

1

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

1/2

1

1/2

1/2

1

1/2

H

H

M

L

52

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Emergency communications equipment / priority control systems

Funds to implement projects for emergency communication + signal preemption

0

0

1

1/2

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

H

M

M

L

50

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Travel demand management strategies / programs

Funds that assist w ith reducing the demand for travel and congestion

1

0

0

1/2

1

1/2

1/2

0

1/2

1

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/2

M

M

M

M

44

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Construction and operational improvements on high-risk rural roads

Projects on FA rural roads that improve safety

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1/2

0

L

M

M

L

36

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Safety devices/control, rumbles, skid resist., or remove obstacles at crash locations

Standalone projects to improve safety w / specific treatments on FA roadw ays

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1/2

0

L

M

M

L

36

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Congestion pricing development / implementation

Funds that can assist w ith starting a congestion pricing scheme

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

0

0

1/2

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/2

0

H

M

L

H

28

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Highw ay signs for retroreflectivity

Standalone projects that increase visibility of roadw ay signs

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

L

M

M

L

28

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Pavement and shoulder w idening to remedy unsafe conditions

Projects that add w idth to address unsafe conditions w ith road narrow ness

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

L

M

M

M

28

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Fringe and corridor parking facilities / programs

Construction of parking lots for car/vanpooling and transit kiss & rides

1/2

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

1/2

L

L

M

L

20

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Protection for bridges including inspections

Funding to assist w ith the inspection of bridges

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

L

L

L

L

16

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Conduct model traffic enforcement activity at rail/highw ay crossing

Funds to promote enforcement at rail/hw y crossings (usually a state level initiative)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

0

L

L

L

L

14

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Promote/educate highw ay safety matters + project to enforce law

Funds to promote or educate roadw ay safety (usually a state level initiative)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

0

L

L

L

L

14

STC

New roadw ays

Surface transport infrastructure to facilitate port "linkages"

New roadw ays connect port facilities to existing transportation system

1/2

0

1/2

0

1/2

0

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

1/2

1/2

L

L

H

M

32

STC

New roadw ays

New truck parking facilities

New parking specifically for trucks

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

1

0

L

L

M

M

26

STC

New roadw ays

New bridge / roadw ay / tunnel construction

New roadw ays, bridges, or tunnels

1/2

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

0

0

1/2

L

L

M

H

22

STC

New roadw ays

Construction of minor collectors in same corridor as NHS route

Construct service lanes along arterial roads; NHS ow ned by INDOT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

0

L

L

M

H

6

Today we will take a second look with your expertise – revisions today will be presented to TPC

Investment impact on future scenarios 12%

High = 1/4 of sco re M ed = 1/8 of sco re Lo w = 0

Investment difficulty factor 8%

Final impact score

NIRPC committee responsible


Program category

NIRPC program name


Project type

eligible projects by FHWA/FTA rules


Project type description

Connected

Renewed

United

Vibrant

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

Economy + place

Environment

Mobility

Our people + leaders

New chances for a

new frontier

Sharp and in focus

Stay in your lane

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Railw ay-highw ay grade crossings

Projects that address safety issues at railroad crossings

0

1/2

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

1/2

0

H

H

H

M

62

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Intersection safety improvements

Projects that attemp to reduce safety issues at intersections

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

M

H

H

L

58

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Intersection congestion improvements

Projects that attempt to reduce congestion at bottleneck locations

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

1/2

0

1

0

1/2

0

M

M

H

L

56

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Bridge rehabilitation or reconstruction

Projects that rehabilitate or reconstruct bridges on FA roads

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

1

0

H

H

H

L

54

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction

Projects that rehabilitate or reconstruct FA roads

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

1

0

H

H

H

L

54

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Intelligent Transportation Systems

Projects that use technology to increase efficiency of transportation system

1/2

0

1

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

1/2

1

1/2

1/2

1

1/2

H

H

M

L

52

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Traffic monitoring / management / control

Funding for the monitoring and management of traffic (usually a state level initiative)

1/2

0

1

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

1/2

1

1/2

1/2

1

1/2

H

H

M

L

52

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Emergency communications equipment / priority control systems

Funds to implement projects for emergency communication + signal preemption

0

0

1

1/2

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

H

M

M

L

50

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Travel demand management strategies / programs

Funds that assist w ith reducing the demand for travel and congestion

1

0

0

1/2

1

1/2

1/2

0

1/2

1

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/2

M

M

M

M

44

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Construction and operational improvements on high-risk rural roads

Projects on FA rural roads that improve safety

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1/2

0

L

M

M

L

36

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Safety devices/control, rumbles, skid resist., or remove obstacles at crash locations

Standalone projects to improve safety w / specific treatments on FA roadw ays

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1/2

0

L

M

M

L

36

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Congestion pricing development / implementation

Funds that can assist w ith starting a congestion pricing scheme

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

0

0

1/2

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/2

0

H

M

L

H

28

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Highw ay signs for retroreflectivity

Standalone projects that increase visibility of roadw ay signs

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

L

M

M

L

28

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Pavement and shoulder w idening to remedy unsafe conditions

Projects that add w idth to address unsafe conditions w ith road narrow ness

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

L

M

M

M

28

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Fringe and corridor parking facilities / programs

Construction of parking lots for car/vanpooling and transit kiss & rides

1/2

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

1/2

L

L

M

L

20

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Protection for bridges including inspections

Funding to assist w ith the inspection of bridges

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

L

L

L

L

16

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Conduct model traffic enforcement activity at rail/highw ay crossing

Funds to promote enforcement at rail/hw y crossings (usually a state level initiative)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

0

L

L

L

L

14

STC

Roadw ay improvement

Promote/educate highw ay safety matters + project to enforce law

Funds to promote or educate roadw ay safety (usually a state level initiative)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

0

L

L

L

L

14

STC

New roadw ays

Surface transport infrastructure to facilitate port "linkages"

New roadw ays connect port facilities to existing transportation system

1/2

0

1/2

0

1/2

0

1/2

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

1/2

1/2

L

L

H

M

32

STC

New roadw ays

New truck parking facilities

New parking specifically for trucks

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

1/2

1/2

0

1

0

L

L

M

M

26

STC

New roadw ays

New bridge / roadw ay / tunnel construction

New roadw ays, bridges, or tunnels

1/2

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

1/2

1/2

0

0

1/2

L

L

M

H

22

STC

New roadw ays

Construction of minor collectors in same corridor as NHS route

Construct service lanes along arterial roads; NHS ow ned by INDOT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1/2

0

0

0

0

0

L

L

M

H

6

Presented below are initial scores computed by staff


High = 1, M ed = 1/2, Lo w = 0 | M o bility wo rth 2x other focus areas


image image image image image

image


image

PART II: Project evaluations

Proposed project evaluation criteria and weights

image

image

image

image

Criteria for every project



image

Access + connections


image

image

Cost effectiveness


Economic generation


image

Environmental benefits


Local policy

image

image

+ plan support

Up to 100

image

image

image

image

points


image

image

image

image

Safety

Safety

Evaluating a project’s ability to make new connections, fill gaps, or increase access

Evaluating a project’s cost effectiveness

Evaluating a project’s impact on generating economic benefits

Evaluating a project’s benefits to the environment

Evaluating a project’s consistency and support of local policy and plans


image

Regional policy + plan support


image

Partnerships


Project readiness


image

image

Social equity


image

Evaluating a project’s consistency and support of regional policy and plans

Evaluating a project’s support from partners

Evaluating a project’s readiness for construction

Evaluating a project’s benefits for a safer transportation system

Evaluating a project’s benefits towards social equity

image

image

STC Programs


Program

Access & Connections

Cost Effectiveness

Economic Generation

Environmental Benefits

Local Policy & Plan Support

Partnerships

Project Readiness

Regional Priority

Safety

Social Equity

New Roadways

  1. All purpose average trip times for households within one mile of proposed corridor

  2. Percent of population within 1/4-mile of a sidewalk, trail, or bicycle facility for population within one mile of proposed corridor

  3. Percent of population within transit service areas for population within one mile of proposed corridor

  4. Modeled improvement of reductions in Vehicle Hours of Travel within two miles of proposed corridor

  5. Emergency Access based on proximity from hospital and medical care purpose average trip time for households within one mile of proposed corridor


20 points

1.Construction materials used


5 points

  1. Employment density within one mile of proposed corridor

  2. Value of time for working population within one mile of proposed corridor

  3. Economic productivity of facilities within one mile of proposed Corridor


15 points

  1. Emissions Reductions

  2. Green Infrastructure Components


5 points

  1. Master Plan or Thoroughfare Plan

  2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP)


15 points

  1. INDOT

  2. Railroads

  3. Public Private Partnership (P3)


5 points

  1. Overmatch

  2. Right of Way owned


5 points

  1. Regional Corridors Study (RCS)

  2. Creative Livable

  3. Congestion Management Program (CMP)

Communities


20 points

  1. Universal Design Criteria

  2. Complete

Streets


5 points

1.Location in EJ Area


5 points

Roadway Improve- ment

  1. All purpose average trip times for households within one mile of proposed corridor

  2. Percent of population within 1/4-mile of a sidewalk, trail, or bicycle facility for population within one mile of proposed corridor

  3. Percent of population within transit service areas for population within one mile of proposed corridor

  4. Modeled improvement of reductions in Vehicle Hours of Travel within two miles of proposed corridor

  5. Emergency Access based on proximity from hospital and medical care purpose average trip time for households within one mile of proposed corridor


20 Points

  1. Planning vs. Infrastructure

  2. Construction materials used


5 Points

  1. Employment density within one mile of proposed corridor

  2. Value of time for working population within one mile of proposed corridor

  3. Economic productivity of facilities within one mile of proposed Corridor


15 points

  1. Emissions Reductions

  2. Green Infrastructure Components


5 points

  1. Master Plan or Thoroughfare Plan

  2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP)


15 points

  1. Major employers

  2. TDM

  3. Transit Agencies

  4. INDOT

  5. Universities

  6. Parking operators

  7. Railroads

  8. Emergency Medical Services

  9. Freight Carriers

  10. Law Enforcement

  11. Public Private Partnership (P3)


5 points

  1. Overmatch

  2. Right of Way owned

  3. Project precedence


5 points

1.2040 Plan

  1. Regional Corridors Study (RCS)

  2. Creating Livable Communities

  3. Congestion Management Program (CMP)

  4. ITS Regional Architecture


15 points

  1. Crashes per 100 million VMT

  2. Number of non- motor crashes

  3. Number railroad crashes

  4. Universal Design Criteria

  5. Complete Streets


10 points

1.Location in EJ Area


5 points