ACTION REQUESTED: Approval
Safety Performance Measure Targets (Resolution 18-19) pp. 2-4
Pavement Condition and Bridge Condition Performance Measure Targets (Resolution 18-20) pp. 5-7
System Reliability, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Performance Measure Targets (Resolution 18-21) pp. 8-10
ACTION REQUESTED: Recommendation to Technical Planning Committee for Approval
NIRPC staff will present the final project type & criteria scoring which will be used to recommend allocations of funding to the Technical Planning Committee. Pp. 11-14
ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion
Creation of Regional Rail Task Force Update
2018 Household Travel Survey Update
Congestion Management Process (CMP) Update
The next Surface Transportation Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 9 a.m. in the Lake Michigan Room at the NIRPC office.
Surface Transportation Committee Meeting NIRPC Lake Michigan Room
October 2, 2018
Christine Cid called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. with the Pledge of Allegiance and self- introductions. Present were Christine Cid, Lake County Council; George Topoll, Union Township Trustee; Jeff Huet, Town of Schererville; Mark Gordish, City of Hammond; David Wright, Gary Public Transportation Corp.; Denny Cobb, First Group Engineering; Jake Dammarell, Butler, Fairman & Seufert; and Vince Epps, Metric Environmental.
NIRPC staff present were Mitch Barloga, Scott Weber, Dominique Edwards, Peter Kimball, and Mary Thorne.
There was no public comment.
On a motion by George Topoll, seconded by Mark Gordish, the September 4, 2018 minutes were approved as presented.
Presentation – Dominique Edwards presented on the 2050 Plan drivers and influences of Northwest Indiana’s future. Summer pop-up events concluded September 1. Feedback was received from over 900 people ranging in age from 5 to 75. The fall series of pop up events begins this week and goes through October 20. Visit www.nirpc.org for more information.
Presentation - Mitch Barloga presented on the draft 2050 Plan and TIP Programmatic Approach Program Scoring revisions based on committee input. Program scoring was reviewed by the Committee and points were changed live as needed based on consensus of the group. Ten sets of project criteria were examined. At the November meeting, project sizes and funding mechanisms will be examined. The NOFA will be out in late November. Submissions are due in January.
George Topoll took over as Chair as Christine Cid had to leave. Scott Weber gave updates as follows:
There was a discrepancy in the CMAQ performance measures. The amended plan will go to the
Technical Planning Committee for recommendation to the Board for approval.
The 2018 Household Travel Survey was sent out and digital travel time collection is being performed. The survey will be released in December.
The next Surface Transportation Committee meeting will be held at 9 a.m. on November 6, 2018. Hearing no other business, George Topoll adjourned the meeting at 11:30 a.m.
Duly adopted by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission this 15th day of November 2018.
Geof R. Benson Chairperson
ATTEST:
Karen Freeman-Wilson Secretary
Performance Measure | 2018 Target | 2019 Target |
Number of fatalities | 814.9 | 889.6 |
Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled | 1.036 | 1.087 |
Number of serious injuries | 3,479.8 | 3,501.9 |
Rate of serious injuries per 100 million vehicle miles traveled | 4.347 | 4.234 |
Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries | 417.0 | 393.6 |
Duly adopted by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission this 15th day of November 2018.
Geof R. Benson Chairperson
ATTEST:
Karen Freeman-Wilson Secretary
Performance Measure | 2019 Target | 2021 Target |
Percentage of Interstate pavements in Good condition | 84.24% | 84.24% |
Percentage of Interstate pavements in Poor condition | 0.80% | 0.80% |
Percentage of non-Interstate National Highway System pavements in Good condition | 78.71% | 78.71% |
Percentage of non-Interstate National Highway System pavements in Poor condition | 3.10% | 3.10% |
Percentage of National Highway System bridges in Good condition | 48.32% | 48.32% |
Percentage of National Highway System bridges in Poor condition | 2.63% | 2.63% |
-IN Urbanized Area, and emissions reductions of applicable criteria pollutants and precursors from Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program-funded projects; and
Duly adopted by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission this 15th day of November 2018.
Geof R. Benson Chairperson
ATTEST:
Karen Freeman-Wilson Secretary
Performance Measure | 2019 Target | 2021 Target |
Percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstates that are reliable | 90.5% | 92.8% |
Percent of person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate National Highway System that are reliable | Not Applicable | 89.8% |
Truck Travel Time Reliability Index on the Interstates | 1.27 | 1.24 |
Annual peak hours of excessive delay per capita on the National Highway System in the Chicago, IL--IN Urbanized Area | Not Applicable | 15.4* |
Percent non-single occupancy vehicle travel in the Chicago, IL--IN Urbanized Area | 31.4%* | 31.9%* |
PM10 reduced (kg/day) from Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program projects | 0.30 | 0.50 |
NOx reduced (kg/day) from Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program projects | 1,600.00 | 2,200.00 |
VOC reduced (kg/day) from Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program projects | 1,600.00 | 2,600.00 |
CO reduced (kg/day) from Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program projects | 200.00 | 400.00 |
CMAQ | HSIP | STBG | TA | 5307 | 5310 | 5337 | 5309 | 5311 | 5339 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment impact on regional vision and plan focus areas 80% High = 1, Med = 1/2, Low = 0 | Mobility worth 2x other focus areas | Investment impact on future scenarios 12% High = 1/4 of score | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | $ available (m) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment difficulty factor 8% | $ 3.61 | $ 2.90 | $ 11.95 | $ 0.98 | $ 12.14 | $ 0.45 | $ 17.44 | $ 0.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | $ assigned | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NIRPC committee responsible | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | $ to allocate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Connected | Renewed | United | Vibrant | $ 3.61 | $ 2.90 | $ 11.95 | $ 0.98 | $ 12.14 | $ 0.45 | $ 17.44 | $ - | $ - | $ 0.60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Program category NIRPC program name | Project type eligible projects by FHWA/FTA rules | Project type description | Economy + place | Environment | Mobility | Our people + leaders | Economy + place | Environment | Mobility | Our people + leaders | Economy + place | Environment | Mobility | Our people + leaders | Economy + place | Environment | Mobility | Our people + leaders | New chances for a new frontier | Sharp and in focus | Stay in your lane | Final impact score | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Eligible? | Federal share | Recommended amount | Total funding allocated to project type | |||
3PC | Multi-use path | Off-road trails | Construction of non-recreational trails | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | H | H | H | H | 78 | Y | 80 | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | ||||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Transportation projects for ADA compliance w/ universal design | Projects that address ADA transition plans along FA roadways | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | H | H | H | M | 80 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Safe Routes to School coordinator | Staff person to organize SRTS planning activities | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | H | H | H | L | 62 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Safe Routes to School non-infrastructure projects | Safe Routes to School educational or planning activities | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | H | H | M | L | 64 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Sidewalks | Sidewalks along FA roadways as a standalone project | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | H | H | H | M | 72 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | On-road trails | Bike lanes/cycle tracks along FA roadways as a standalone project | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | H | H | M | L | 74 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Safe Routes to School infrastructure projects | Projects around school zones (can be off federally-aid roads) | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | H | H | M | M | 68 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Bicycle infrastructure | Bicycle racks, signage, & ancillary treatments to support cycling | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | H | H | M | L | 66 | Y | 80 | - | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Bicycle/pedestrian signals | HAWK, pedestrian count downs, etc. along federally-aided (FA) roadways | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | M | M | 74 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Construction / installation / maintenance of signs at bike/ped xings in school zone | Bike and pedestrians crossings in school zones along FA roadways | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | M | M | M | L | 48 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
3PC | Complete streets | Lighting | Lighting on trails as a standalone project | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | M | M | L | M | 22 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Environment | Stormwater management / control / prevention | Funds to reduce stormwater as a standalone project | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | H | H | H | L | 74 | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Environment | Vegetation management in ROWs | Funds to assist in the management of vegetation along FA roadways | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | H | H | H | L | 54 | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Environment | Contrib. to restore / enhance / create habitats + wetlands or mitigation banking | Improve habitats + wetlands as a standalone project or bank land for mitigation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | H | H | H | M | 56 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Environment | Vehicle related wildlife mortality reduction | Treatments to reduce the death of wildlife and improve safety for vehicles | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | M | M | M | M | 42 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Environment | Archeological activities for mitigation | Funds to assist with archeological activities in construction | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | L | L | L | 14 | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Air quality | Transit vehicle emission reduction (new or modification) | Funds to assist with the cost of cleaner transit vehicles | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | H | L | 72 | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Air quality | Diesel vehicle emission reduction (new or modification) | Funds to assist with the cost of cleaner vehicles | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | H | L | 70 | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Air quality | Alternative fuel infrastructure | Electric, natural gas or propane fuel infrastructure | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | H | M | 78 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Air quality | Advanced truck stop electrification | Electrification of truck stop parking to reduce/eliminate idling | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | H | H | 56 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
EMPC | Air quality | Air quality education | Program to increase awareness and knowledge of pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | H | H | H | L | 54 | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
LUC | Quality of place | Divided highway conversion to boulevards | Projects to improve the livability of FA arterial roadways | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | M | H | H | L | 68 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
LUC | Quality of place | Traffic calming | Treatments that reduce travel speed and improve ped/bike comfort | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | H | H | H | M | 68 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||
LUC | Quality of place | Inventory / control / removal of outdoor advertising | Funds to reduce billboards/signage to improve beauty along FA roadways | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | H | H | M | H | 50 | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
LUC | Quality of place | Roadway expansion | Widening of roadways to address congestion | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | M | H | M | 36 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
LUC | Quality of place | Historic preserve of historic transportation facilities | Funds to preserve historic transportation facilities | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | M | M | L | M | 42 | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
LUC | Quality of place | Turnouts / overlooks | Projects that provide for parking at scenic locations | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | M | M | M | M | 22 | N | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Railway-highway grade crossings | Projects that address safety issues at railroad crossings | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | H | H | H | M | 62 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Intersection safety improvements | Projects that attemp to reduce safety issues at intersections | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | M | H | H | L | 66 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Intersection congestion improvements | Projects that attempt to reduce congestion at bottleneck locations | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | M | M | H | L | 58 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Bridge rehabilitation or reconstruction | Projects that rehabilitate or reconstruct bridges on FA roads | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | H | H | H | L | 54 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction | Projects that rehabilitate or reconstruct FA roads | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | H | H | H | L | 62 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Intelligent Transportation Systems | Projects that use technology to increase efficiency of transportation system | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | M | L | 64 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Traffic monitoring / management / control | Funding for the monitoring and management of traffic (usually a state level initiative) | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | H | H | M | L | 56 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Emergency communications equipment / priority control systems | Funds to implement projects for emergency communication + signal preemption | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | H | M | M | L | 50 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Travel demand management strategies / programs | Funds that assist with reducing the demand for travel and congestion | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | M | M | M | M | 44 | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Construction and operational improvements on high-risk rural roads | Projects on FA rural roads that improve safety | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | L | M | M | L | 36 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Safety devices/control, rumbles, skid resist., or remove obstacles at crash locations | Standalone projects to improve safety w/ specific treatments on FA roadways | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | L | M | M | L | 36 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Congestion pricing development / implementation | Funds that can assist with starting a congestion pricing scheme | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | H | M | L | H | 28 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Highway signs for retroreflectivity | Standalone projects that increase visibility of roadway signs | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | M | M | L | 28 | N | Y | 90 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Pavement and shoulder widening to remedy unsafe conditions | Projects that add width to address unsafe conditions with road narrowness | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | M | M | M | 28 | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Fringe and corridor parking facilities / programs | Construction of parking lots for car/vanpooling and transit kiss & rides | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | L | L | M | L | 20 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Protection for bridges including inspections | Funding to assist with the inspection of bridges | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | L | L | L | 16 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Conduct model traffic enforcement activity at rail/highway crossing | Funds to promote enforcement at rail/hwy crossings (usually a state level initiative) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | L | L | L | 14 | N | Y | 90 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | Roadway improvement | Promote/educate highway safety matters + project to enforce law | Funds to promote or educate roadway safety (usually a state level initiative) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | L | L | L | 14 | N | Y | 90 | - | N | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
STC | New roadways | Surface transport infrastructure to facilitate port "linkages" | New roadways connect port facilities to existing transportation system | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | L | L | H | M | 32 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | New roadways | New truck parking facilities | New parking specifically for trucks | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | L | L | M | M | 26 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | New roadways | New bridge / roadway / tunnel construction | New roadways, bridges, or tunnels | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | L | L | M | H | 32 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
STC | New roadways | Construction of minor collectors in same corridor as NHS route | Construct service lanes along arterial roads; NHS owned by INDOT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | L | L | M | H | 6 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||||
TOR | Transit / safety | Transit security | Funding required to be spent to improve the safety and security of transit | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | M | M | M | L | 44 | N | N | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | Y | 80 | - | N | $ - | |||||||||||||
TOR | Transit / operating | Complementary paratransit service to fixed route service | Funding forservice for users who cannot use fixed routes due to disability | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1/2 | 1 | H | H | H | L | 82 | N | N | N | N | Y | 90 | - | Y | 80 | - | N | N | N | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||||
TOR | Transit / operating | Operating assistance | Funding to assist with the operations for transit systems | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | H | H | H | L | 74 | N | N | N | N | Y | 50 | - | Y | 50 | - | N | N | Y | 50 | - | N | $ - | |||||||||||||||
TOR | Transit / operating | Operational support equipment / computer hard/software | Funding to support the purchase of equipment related to operations of transit | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||